Take Profit Trader vs Apex Trader Funding
Compare pricing, evaluation rules, funded rules, payouts and platforms side by side. Change the firm, account type or size in each card and the whole table updates instantly.
🇺🇸 United States · est. 2021
🇺🇸 United States · est. 2021
Take Profit TraderApex Trader Funding
NinjaTrader
Tradovate
TradingView
Rithmic
- NinjaTrader
- Rithmic
- Tradovate
- TradingView
WealthCharts
Plane
Wise
Plaid
- Plane
- Plaid
We may earn a commission if you sign up through our links — at no extra cost to you. How we make money
Key Differences
Take Profit Trader and Apex Trader Funding take noticeably different approaches to funding traders. Apex Trader Funding is the cheapest way in — entry-level evaluations start at $19.90 with code TICKSHIFT (-90%), versus $150 at Take Profit Trader.
On experience, Take Profit Trader has been operating since 2021, giving it the longest public payout track record here, while Take Profit Trader (est. 2021) competes with same day (pro+) payouts and a maximum allocation of $450K. Profit splits reach 80% at Take Profit Trader and 90% at Apex Trader Funding.
Rule structure is where most traders should focus: compare each firm's drawdown style, consistency rule and daily loss limit in the table above — switching the account type and size dropdowns updates every row so you can compare the exact accounts you'd actually buy.
Trading Rules: Side-by-Side
Which Firm Is Right for You?
Budget-Conscious Beginners
Our pick
Apex Trader Funding
- Evaluations from $19.90 with code TICKSHIFT
- Intraday Trail · Standard uses a intraday trailing drawdown
- Payouts: Every 5 trading days
Experienced Traders
Our pick
Take Profit Trader
- Scale up to $450K in total allocation
- Profit split up to 80%
- PRO Evaluation for advanced rule flexibility
Frequently Asked Questions
With current discounts, entry-level evaluations start at $150 at Take Profit Trader, $19.90 at Apex Trader Funding (code TICKSHIFT). Use the dropdowns above to compare the exact account type and size you plan to buy — pricing gaps change significantly across sizes, and the “Cost per $1K” row normalizes them.